A new promotional video released by the Department of Homeland Security characterizes white middle class Americans as the most likely terrorists.
Via Infowars:
Somehow this findings from this December report didn’t make it into the video… In the last 24 months (2009 and 2010) 126 people were indicted on terrorist-related charges in the United States. All of them were Muslim.
This is what tyranny looks like -- The video is part of Homeland Security’s $10 million dollar “See Something, Say Something” program that encourages Americans to report “suspicious activity,” which in every case throughout history has been a trait of oppressive, dictatorial regimes.
In the course of the 10 minute clip, a myriad of different behaviors are characterized as terrorism, including opposing surveillance, using a video camera, talking to police officers, wearing hoodies, driving vans, writing on a piece of paper, and using a cell phone recording application.
Showing posts with label Tyranny. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tyranny. Show all posts
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Thursday, July 22, 2010
The Pace Quickens
An excellent speech from retired U.S General Paul Vallely.
Vallely clearly points out the major threats to US survival-Russia, China, Jihad, looming war in the Middle East, financial problems, much of the US media and most of rulers in Washington DC.
Vallely calls for constitutionalist candidates to take back America from the "progressives" before it is too late.
From New Zeal here:
Vallely clearly points out the major threats to US survival-Russia, China, Jihad, looming war in the Middle East, financial problems, much of the US media and most of rulers in Washington DC.
Vallely calls for constitutionalist candidates to take back America from the "progressives" before it is too late.
From New Zeal here:
Labels:
Tyranny
Monday, December 21, 2009
Chavez's New Federal Police Force
The new federal police will try and stop the crime, caused by the government's own policies and executioners ... LOL -- Next the gulags will open. I wonder when they voted for Chavez, did they think this far ahead?
President Hugo Chavez launched a federal police force on Sunday that he hopes will change the overwhelmingly negative image most Venezuelans have of their public security forces while reducing crime in one of Latin America's most violent countries.
"We are going to defeat crime," Chavez told uniformed cadets belonging to the newly formed National Bolivarian Police Force during his weekly television and radio show. "We are tackling one of our population's most sensitive problems: crime prevention."
Chavez greeted and shook hands with the officers before they began patrolling in Catia, one of the most dangerous districts of Caracas.
The 950-agent force will initially operate in the capital's most crime-ridden neighborhoods, but the government plans to boost the number of officers to 6,000 and extend its reach beyond Caracas by the end of next year.
President Hugo Chavez launched a federal police force on Sunday that he hopes will change the overwhelmingly negative image most Venezuelans have of their public security forces while reducing crime in one of Latin America's most violent countries.
"We are going to defeat crime," Chavez told uniformed cadets belonging to the newly formed National Bolivarian Police Force during his weekly television and radio show. "We are tackling one of our population's most sensitive problems: crime prevention."
Chavez greeted and shook hands with the officers before they began patrolling in Catia, one of the most dangerous districts of Caracas.
The 950-agent force will initially operate in the capital's most crime-ridden neighborhoods, but the government plans to boost the number of officers to 6,000 and extend its reach beyond Caracas by the end of next year.
Friday, March 20, 2009
Tyranny And The 2nd Amendment
Tyranny comes in many forms ---
The Second Amendment went through a sort of rebirth last year, when a crystal clear ruling from the US Supreme Court ruled that it does indeed protect an individual right to keep and bear arms. And it spelled out two primary purposes, neither of which includes duck hunting. The first was the right to self defense. Isn't that one obvious? The second is the right to defend country against all enemies foreign and domestic. And yes it did establish that common infantry weapons available to the military were in fact the weapons that were to be protected from government. That would be those 'black scary' weapons Diane Feinstein is always waving around saying they should be banned.
Well for liberals, it amounted to a rebirth, if not an abortion.
The idea of tyranny is to reduce the effectiveness of the enemy, the enemy, that would be the people the tyrants rule over. And with a whole lot of nations of the world, Mexico being our closest neighbor is one of the worse (they prevent their citizens from owning a military caliber weapon) -- Most tyrannical nations take the approach of restricting military style arms from civilian use. Makes the tyrants job a whole lot safer and much easier.
You can extrapolate what you will from the way our Democrats and tyrants behave towards 'black scary' weapons and draw your own conclusions. Did you ever think that they are black because that is one of the easiest plastics to make durable? Personally I prefer wood stocked, but the durability factor is far in favor of plastics.
Most in the Supreme Court chamber seem to agree that the Second Amendment protects an individual right. The issues most in contention include the meaning of the words "keep" and "bear," and whether the amendment protects the possession of arms only during militia service or also for self-defense; whether a total ban on handguns is a "reasonable" regulation of firearms; whether restrictions on the right to arms should be subject to "strict scrutiny," or legislatures or courts should be able to decide what is "reasonable;" and what kinds of regulations would be "reasonable" under the Second Amendment.
To allow easily access and the ability to navigate through all of the detailed information we've compiled on District of Columbia v. Heller, NRA-ILA unveils a new site -http://www.nraila.org/heller/-that contains related articles and the dozens of amicus briefs filed in the case.
A Gallup poll finds that an overwhelming majority of the United States public-73%-believes that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of Americans to own firearms.
"Mankind will in time discover that unbridled majorities are as tyrannical and cruel as unlimited despots." – John AdamsToday's outrage of AIG and their Obama approved bonuses is an fine example of Adams' quote.
The Second Amendment went through a sort of rebirth last year, when a crystal clear ruling from the US Supreme Court ruled that it does indeed protect an individual right to keep and bear arms. And it spelled out two primary purposes, neither of which includes duck hunting. The first was the right to self defense. Isn't that one obvious? The second is the right to defend country against all enemies foreign and domestic. And yes it did establish that common infantry weapons available to the military were in fact the weapons that were to be protected from government. That would be those 'black scary' weapons Diane Feinstein is always waving around saying they should be banned.
Well for liberals, it amounted to a rebirth, if not an abortion.
The idea of tyranny is to reduce the effectiveness of the enemy, the enemy, that would be the people the tyrants rule over. And with a whole lot of nations of the world, Mexico being our closest neighbor is one of the worse (they prevent their citizens from owning a military caliber weapon) -- Most tyrannical nations take the approach of restricting military style arms from civilian use. Makes the tyrants job a whole lot safer and much easier.
You can extrapolate what you will from the way our Democrats and tyrants behave towards 'black scary' weapons and draw your own conclusions. Did you ever think that they are black because that is one of the easiest plastics to make durable? Personally I prefer wood stocked, but the durability factor is far in favor of plastics.
Most in the Supreme Court chamber seem to agree that the Second Amendment protects an individual right. The issues most in contention include the meaning of the words "keep" and "bear," and whether the amendment protects the possession of arms only during militia service or also for self-defense; whether a total ban on handguns is a "reasonable" regulation of firearms; whether restrictions on the right to arms should be subject to "strict scrutiny," or legislatures or courts should be able to decide what is "reasonable;" and what kinds of regulations would be "reasonable" under the Second Amendment.
To allow easily access and the ability to navigate through all of the detailed information we've compiled on District of Columbia v. Heller, NRA-ILA unveils a new site -http://www.nraila.org/heller/-that contains related articles and the dozens of amicus briefs filed in the case.
A Gallup poll finds that an overwhelming majority of the United States public-73%-believes that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of Americans to own firearms.
Consider that socialism and Communism in it's varying forms killed 100-125 million people throughout the 20th century, in pursuit of perfection. Next time you hear some socialist extolling the virtues, you might want to bring this up.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)