Oakland Shootings

Case study in liberalism ... From the article of the event:

"(Mixon) was on parole and he had a warrant out for his arrest for violating that parole. And he was on parole for assault with a deadly weapon," said Oakland police Deputy Chief Jeffery Israel.

Does this mean it was illegal for him to have guns? And carry them? And have an "assault weapon"? And kill? How many violations were put on the books before we need more gun laws comes up?

The shocking thing to me is he was on parole ... Why?

Police said they did not know exactly why the officers initially stopped the suspect, but said it apparently was a routine traffic stop.

And then there is this:

People lingered at the scene of the first shooting. About 20 bystanders taunted police.

Tension between police and the community has risen steadily since the fatal shooting of unarmed 22-year-old Oscar Grant by a transit police officer at an Oakland train station on Jan. 1.

Isn't this what is really ticking out there? And isn't this really the main reason people are buuying guns at a frantic pace? Remember those Korean shopkeepers with their 12 GA in the LA Rodney King riots?

Doesn't Obama want to release the GITMO terrorists into America? Why?